Post-COVID competence | Are your employees still health and safety aware?
Written on 9 July 2021
For businesses, adapting to the full reopening of society will be a significant task. Amongst more immediate challenges such as return to work planning and wrestling with confusing government guidance, employers must also take the time to reflect on how the last 15 months have impacted their employees, both personally and professionally. This includes reviewing employees’ ‘competence’.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) describes competence as “the combination of training, skills, experience and knowledge that a person has and their ability to apply them to perform a task safely”. Other factors, such as attitude and physical ability, may also affect an employee’s competence.
In the words of Former HSE Chair, Judith Hackitt, competence is “the ability for every director, manager and worker to recognise the risks in operational activities and then apply the right measures to control and manage those risks”.
Like any other skill, over time, individuals’ health and safety competence may become ‘rusty’ if not exercised. If employees don’t apply this skill on a regular basis – as will be the case for homeworkers and those on furlough – they may quickly become out of practice. This can lead to complacency, and accidents may follow.
What’s more, the workplace may be different to how employees left it, and there may be new hazards present that they will need to be aware of in order to work safely.
Can employees still recognise workplace risks? Are the measures needed to manage those risks still being applied? In short, are your employees still in a position to do their jobs without causing harm to themselves and/or others?
If not, what support is needed to bring employee competence back up to pre-pandemic levels?
What the law says
Under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act (HSWA) 1974, all employers have a duty, so far as is “reasonably practicable”, to protect the health, safety and welfare of persons at work. As part of this duty, you must provide employees (as well as workers, contractors and self-employed people undertaking work for you) with the information, instruction and training necessary to undertake their job safety.
This will typically include the hazards and risks they may face, the measures in place to deal with those hazards and risk, and how to follow any emergency procedures.
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 also require that employers carry out a “suitable and sufficient” risk assessment of their activities. This assessment of risk involves taking account of employees’ capabilities. This is all the more important because a worker’s competence affects not only their safety and that of their colleagues but also the safety of others, such as visitors, contractors and members of the public. Indeed, the HSE says employers must ensure anyone performing a task on their behalf has the competence to do so without putting the health and safety of themselves or others at significant risk.
Conducting the required risk assessments will help you decide what level of information, instruction, training and supervision you need to provide.
Do you need support?
Speak to us for an honest, no obligation chat on:
0345 226 8393 Lines are open 9am – 5pm
Why competence needs revisiting
The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on workplaces, systems of work and indeed workers themselves. As a result, employers should consider the various impacts of the pandemic and whether the competence of your employees has been adversely affected as a result.
Areas to consider include:
The economic impact
A House of Commons research briefing on the economic impact of coronavirus says: “The magnitude of the recession caused by the pandemic is unprecedented in modern times. GDP declined by 9.8% in 2020, the steepest drop since consistent records began in 1948 and the most in over three hundred years on some estimates.”
The unprecedented recession has forced many businesses into restructuring and rationalising their operations. Of course, in scaling back activities, there may be a health and safety impact. Restructuring may, for example, lead to fewer staff, less equipment and training budgets being squeezed. Employees may also be in new roles, with new risks. All of this may impact employees’ competence.
For this reason, any pandemic cost-cutting must distinguish between any ‘nice to haves’ and non-negotiable legal requirements. The HSWA’s requirement to provide employees with information, instruction, training and supervision falls into the latter category, and employers’ duty to ensure staff are competent isn’t conditional on the state of the economy.
Also, bear in mind that putting training on a backburner of things you can’t afford right now may actually prove more costly in the long run, as accidents can incur significant expenses in relation to investigation time, employee absences, productivity losses, personal injury claims and reputational damage, amongst other things.
The individual impact
Again, with so many workers returning to employers’ premises for the first time in many months, their ability to perform at pre-pandemic levels may have been impaired.
Clearly, when we haven’t done something for a while, we are liable to become less good at it. Accordingly, it may be necessary to consider refresher training, which may be overdue given many workers have long been absent from their normal working environment. If employees have specific qualifications, check that they haven’t expired.
Don’t forget those working from home, as these individuals still fall within the scope of the HSWA. Have you provided them with sufficient information, instruction and training to enable them to work safely without direct supervision? Have they been made aware of the specific health and safety risks associated with homeworking and good practice for managing them? Have they received DSE training? Do they know how to report any issues?
Finally, if you are amongst the 56% of UK firms planning to hire new staff, these individuals will also require a proper induction so that they are competent and risk-aware from day one.
The impact on workplaces and work systems
The pandemic has radically changed workplaces. Socially-distanced work stations, protective screens and one-way systems have become the norm. However, these COVID controls may have introduced new hazards or impacted existing risk assessments.
Similarly, workers have had to adapt their ways of working. Very few employees are still working in exactly the same way as before the pandemic. Systems of work have had to change to mitigate the risk of infection. Commonplace changes include social distancing, staff bubbles, intensified cleaning regimes and added PPE requirements.
Given things have changed so much, its vital that the risks are reassessed. The risk assessment needs to consider how things have developed in the workplace and how employees fit into the changes made. Not only will roles likely have changed but the physical layout may be very different. Workers may be doing unfamiliar tasks, either due to systems changes and/or restructuring. Are they competent to undertake them safely?
Don’t forget to communicate your risk assessment’s findings and how things have changed. Make sure workers know what’s expected of them, where further details can be found and who they can go to for guidance, and ensure any training provided takes these new working methods into account.
Raise competence across your organisation with our support
At Ellis Whittam, we help employers to embed health and safety into their organisation and increase ownership, awareness and competence at every level through dedicated consultant support, award-winning risk management software, e-Learning and more.
For more information on our fixed-fee service, or to enquire about our expert training courses, call 0345 226 8393 or request your free consultation using the button below.
Sign up for the latest news & insights
Latest News & Insights
‘Picking on’ or performance managing? How to address grievances from ‘sensitive’ staff
BLOG Written by Alexandra Farmer on 28 February 2023 Performance management is a crucial process that managers use to evaluate employee performance and identify areas
Revisiting performance management | How to avoid legal risks when getting your team back on track
BLOG Written by Emma Chandler on 28 February 2023 Managing your team’s performance is crucial to the success of your business, and the beginning of
King’s Coronation bank holiday | Do employees have a right to time off on 8 May?
BLOG Written by Alexandra Farmer on 24 February 2023 Many Brits enjoyed not one but two additional bank holidays in 2022: one to mark the Queen’s Platinum
Disability harassment in the workplace | Is ignorance an excuse?
BLOG Written by Lesley Rennie on 24 February 2023 Under the Equality Act 2010, employers in the UK have a number of duties towards employees who
Health and safety culture | 7 ways to engage your employees in workplace health and safety
BLOG Written by Ross Henderson on 22 February 2023 Creating and maintaining a positive health and safety culture is essential for any organisation. Establishing safety
WorkNest Launches SafetyNest to Help Businesses Mitigate Rising Health and Safety Penalties for Non-Compliance
NEWS Written on 22 February 2023 Today, we are excited to announce the launch of SafetyNest, our real-time risk management software that ensures businesses don’t
Teacher strikes | 10 things schools need to know about industrial action
BLOG Written by Jane Hallas on 9 February 2023 Industrial action is a major concern for schools right now, and the prospect can cause a great deal
The future of fire and rehire | Could a new Code of Practice put a stop to pay cut ultimatums?
BLOG Written by James Tamm on 2 February 2023 Last week, the UK government published a draft Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement, outlining
Remote redundancy | Is consultation via Zoom, email or phone legal?
BLOG Written on 30 January 2023 After Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc, cut 12,000 jobs via email recently, there’s been much debate over the appropriacy