Are you in a redundancy situation?
Written by Danielle Scott on 9 January 2023
The UK economy is on course to shrink in 2023, forcing UK businesses to make some difficult decisions regarding their workforce. With labour costs accounting for as much as 70% of total business costs, many employers will be forced to reduce their headcount in an attempt to stay afloat.
Redundancy is a particularly complex area of employment law, and those who find themselves facing a redundancy situation may be confused about the legalities involved. First and foremost, it can be hard for organisations to establish when redundancy applies.
So, are you actually in a redundancy situation?
The business case
When contemplating making redundancies, the first item on the agenda for employers should be to give thorough consideration to the practicality, viability, and necessity of it. While many businesses are facing financial hardship in 2023, and redundancy may seem like the only viable way forward, this is still a consideration that should always take place.
More specifically, every redundancy situation should start with a plan. Employers must consider necessity, what alternatives have been considered or implemented, how many redundancies are needed, where will they come from, how people will be selected, and what the timeline is.
Many of these points may well be flexible and, as part of a proper consultation process, may be liable to change following discussion with employees. That said, it is still vital to start with some kind of plan of what you are trying to achieve and why. As employment lawyers, we will always want to see a client’s redundancy rationale as a first port of call to make sure their business case is robust, and to better understand what they are trying to achieve.
While an Employment Tribunal won’t look behind the decision to make redundancies or judge whether or not they were commercially sound (instead being concerned about the process, the consultation, the pooling, the selection criteria and the search for alternatives), having a sound business case is still important for your own planning requirements, as well as to explain the ‘why’ to your workforce. The latter will be crucial to avoiding disputes.
Do you need support?
Speak to us for an honest, no obligation chat on:
0345 226 8393 Lines are open 9am – 5pm
When is redundancy an option?
Employers must also understand what constitutes a redundancy situation.
Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, there are three situations in which an employee may be dismissed due to redundancy. These are:
- If the employer has ceased, or intends to cease, trading (i.e a total business closure);
- If the employer has closed, or intends to close, a particular site; or
- If there is a reduced requirement for employees to carry out work of a particular kind.
In order to legitimately issue a redundancy, one of these scenarios must apply. In other words, redundancy cannot be used as a way to evade a problem or as a convenient workaround to get rid of a troublesome or underperforming employee; these situations must be dealt with through the correct route, i.e. via the disciplinary or performance management procedure.
Total versus temporary closures
The ‘total closure’ scenario is self-explanatory. If a business is due to close completely, then that will amount to a redundancy situation. Here there is no issue about pooling, selection, or alternative employment, as it’s likely everyone will be made redundant.
However, this can include temporary closures too, which is where it gets complicated. A common example of this would be if the site was closed for refurbishment. Whether this sort of situation would provide grounds for redundancy would be fact-specific and determined on a case-by-case basis.
When it appears that the employer is replacing one business with another, a Tribunal may have to decide whether the new business is sufficiently different in nature from the original one. If so, the dismissal of the employer’s original employees will be for redundancy. Again, this will come down to a question of fact.
A site or workplace closure is, again, relatively self-explanatory. For instance, if a company owns a series of factories and closes one of them, then that is likely to be a redundancy situation.
One caveat that often arises is the question of which site the employee actually works at and if they should even be affected at all. The general consensus here is that the Tribunal will largely ignore what the contract says and instead look at the reality of the situation.
When considering this type of redundancy, the starting point is the requirements of the business. This implies a commercial judgement, on the employer’s part, about the priorities of the business and about which kind of work has become surplus to requirement.
When it comes to a business closure, employers must also be mindful of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations, also known as TUPE.
With business closures, especially those being instigated as part of a pre-pack administration, TUPE will apply and the workforce will transfer to the new owner rather than being made redundant.
These situations can be very fact specific, so you always want to run any sales/takeovers past your legal advisers to be sure that you don’t accidentally make employees redundant, when they are legally entitled to something else.
Get redundancy right with WorkNest
From determining whether your organisation is in a genuine redundancy situation to understanding redundancy pay and settlement agreements, we assign named experts who will help you transform complex legislation into a series of manageable steps. Learn more about our redundancy support.
Sign up for the latest news & insights
Latest News & Insights
6 common long-term sick leave frustrations – and why you can’t just dismiss
BLOG Written by Susie Lockheart on 22 March 2023 The longer sickness absence drags on, the greater the cost to organisations. As such, employers are
New WorkNest Survey Identifies Alarming Link Between Financial Pressures and Employee Underperformance
NEWS Written on 14 March 2023 Our recent survey has revealed that almost half of employers (46%) believe financial pressures are one of the main external
‘Picking on’ or performance managing? How to address grievances from ‘sensitive’ staff
BLOG Written by Alexandra Farmer on 28 February 2023 Performance management is a crucial process that managers use to evaluate employee performance and identify areas
Revisiting performance management | How to avoid legal risks when getting your team back on track
BLOG Written by Emma Chandler on 28 February 2023 Managing your team’s performance is crucial to the success of your business, and the beginning of
King’s Coronation bank holiday | Do employees have a right to time off on 8 May?
BLOG Written by Alexandra Farmer on 24 February 2023 Many Brits enjoyed not one but two additional bank holidays in 2022: one to mark the Queen’s Platinum
Disability harassment in the workplace | Is ignorance an excuse?
BLOG Written by Lesley Rennie on 24 February 2023 Under the Equality Act 2010, employers in the UK have a number of duties towards employees who
Health and safety culture | 7 ways to engage your employees in workplace health and safety
BLOG Written by Ross Henderson on 22 February 2023 Creating and maintaining a positive health and safety culture is essential for any organisation. Establishing safety
WorkNest Launches SafetyNest to Help Businesses Mitigate Rising Health and Safety Penalties for Non-Compliance
NEWS Written on 22 February 2023 Today, we are excited to announce the launch of SafetyNest, our real-time risk management software that ensures businesses don’t
Teacher strikes | 10 things schools need to know about industrial action
BLOG Written by Jane Hallas on 9 February 2023 Industrial action is a major concern for schools right now, and the prospect can cause a great deal